Jennifer Rigterink
Associate
Jennifer Rigterink is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.
In the employee benefits area, Jennifer’s practice focuses on an array of tax and benefits issues impacting both multiemployer and single-employer benefit plans and plan fiduciaries. She assists clients on matters pertaining to plan administration, design and qualification, as well as regulatory, legislative and legal compliance.
Prior to joining Proskauer, Jennifer clerked for Judge Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and Judge Yvette Kane in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
Subscribe to all posts by Jennifer Rigterink
As part of our ongoing series on the SECURE Act, this post discusses two key changes affecting defined benefit plans: (1) the ability to start in-service distributions at age 59½ (reduced from 62), and (2) new tools for closed defined benefit plans to pass nondiscrimination tests. Below we discuss each change and its potential impact … Continue Reading
The SECURE Act, included as part of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, was signed into law on December 20, 2019. This new law contains many significant changes that may impact employer-sponsored benefit plans. Given the scope of the law and the number of changes, we will release a series of blog posts exploring the … Continue Reading
The IRS recently released a final regulation clarifying how voluntary employees’ beneficiary associations (VEBAs) and supplemental unemployment benefit trusts (SUBs) should calculate unrelated business taxable income. VEBAs and SUBs are tax-exempt entities that are used to fund employee benefit programs. Read below for background, details of the final regulation, and the applicability date. Background Although … Continue Reading
Last Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit ruled that two co-investing Sun Capital private equity funds (the Sun Funds)[1] had not created an implied “partnership-in-fact” for purposes of determining whether the Sun Funds were under “common control” with their portfolio company, Scott Brass, Inc. (SBI) – resulting in a ruling that … Continue Reading
On October 23, 2019, the Department of Labor published a new proposed regulation that paves the way for “notice and access” electronic delivery of certain disclosures for retirement plans. The proposal is welcome news for plan sponsors and administrators who have been frustrated by the existing “opt-in” regime for electronic disclosure. But the proposal is … Continue Reading
The IRS recently released final regulations making a number of changes to the rules applicable to hardship distributions from 401(k) and 403(b) plans. Concluding our three-part series on the final regulations, this blog entry will focus on the following changes to the hardship distribution rules: (1) modifications to the list of safe harbor expenses that … Continue Reading
As discussed in our prior blog entry, the IRS recently released final regulations making a number of significant changes to the rules applicable to hardship distributions from 401(k) and 403(b) plans. As part of our continuing series on these final regulations, this blog entry will focus on two specific issues: (1) the elimination of the … Continue Reading
Last week, the Department of Treasury and the IRS issued final regulations regarding hardship distributions from 401(k) and 403(b) plans. The final regulations respond to comments based on earlier proposed regulations and make a number of significant changes to the existing IRS rules that apply to hardship distributions. Given the detailed material in the regulatory … Continue Reading
In Revenue Ruling 2019-19, the IRS answered three basic questions about the consequences of an individual’s failure to cash a distribution check from a qualified retirement plan. Uncashed checks arise in a number of contexts and questions on the taxation of uncashed checks should be carefully considered. In the hypothetical posed by the IRS, Individual … Continue Reading
In the latest volley between participants and group health plans over mental health services coverage, a federal district court in California denied United Healthcare’s motion to dismiss a putative class action challenging the reimbursement rates for out-of-network mental health services. In this case, the plaintiffs alleged that UHC reduced reimbursement rates for out-of-network services by … Continue Reading
New regulations issued by the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services (the “Departments”) have expanded the use of health reimbursement arrangements (“HRAs”), including permitting the use of HRAs to reimburse premiums for individual health insurance coverage. As part of this expansion, and recognizing that some employers might want the flexibility to offer … Continue Reading
New regulations issued by the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and Health and Human Services have expanded the use of health reimbursement accounts (“HRAs”) by allowing reimbursements for individual market insurance premiums. As noted in the final regulations, Individual Coverage HRAs and Excepted Benefit HRAs are group health plans subject to ERISA. However, individual health insurance … Continue Reading
Last week, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancements (SECURE) Act of 2019. To become law, the bill still needs to be passed by the Senate and signed by the President. Because there appears to be bipartisan support, there is a chance that some form of the SECURE … Continue Reading
On May 1, 2019, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2019-20 which provides for a limited-scope expansion of its determination letter program for individually designed plans. Beginning on September 1, 2019, the IRS will accept determination letter applications submitted for the following types of plans: Statutory hybrid plans (e.g., cash balance or pension equity plans). Applications … Continue Reading
Last Friday, the IRS issued eagerly-awaited proposed regulations regarding hardship distributions under section 401(k) and 403(b) plans (the “Proposed Regulations”). The Proposed Regulations primarily address hardship distribution issues raised by the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 (the “Budget Act”). (For our earlier blog entry summarizing these issues, click here.) At the same time, the Proposed … Continue Reading
SECURE Act: Two Key Changes for Defined Benefit Plans
By Seth Safra and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Defined Benefit Pension Plans
New Year, New World: A Short Guide to the SECURE Act for Retirement Plan Sponsors and Administrators
By Paul M. Hamburger, Steven Weinstein and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans, ERISA Coverage
New IRS Guidance for Tax-Exempt Entities Funding Employee Benefits
By Paul M. Hamburger and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Health Plan Compliance
Sun Capital Update: First Circuit Reverses District Court’s “Partnership-in-Fact” Holding and Finds Private Equity Funds Not Part of Controlled Group and Not Liable for Portfolio Company’s Pension Liabilities
By Ira G. Bogner, Ira Golub, Justin Alex, Adam Scoll and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Controlled Groups, Withdrawal Liability
Guide to DOL’s New “Notice and Access” Proposal for Electronic Delivery
By Seth Safra and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Disclosure
Final Hardship Distribution Regulations, Part Three: New Disaster Relief and Expanded Sources Available for Hardship Distributions
By Paul M. Hamburger and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans, 403(b) Plans
Final Hardship Distribution Regulations, Part Two: Implementation Considerations
By Paul M. Hamburger and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans, 403(b) Plans
Final Hardship Distribution Regulations, Part One: Key Changes and Deadlines for Plan Sponsors
By Paul M. Hamburger and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans, 403(b) Plans
Back to Basics: IRS Issues Ruling About Failure to Cash a Distribution Check from a Qualified Retirement Plan
By Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in IRS Guidance
District Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Mental Health Parity Act Putative Class Action
By Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Mental Health Parity
Digging into the New HRA Regulations Part 4: Excepted Benefit HRAs
By Damian A. Myers and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in HRA
Digging into the New HRA Regulations, Part 2 – ERISA Implications
By Damian A. Myers and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in HRA
SECURE Act: Key Changes for Plan Sponsors and Employers
By Paul M. Hamburger, Seth Safra and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans
IRS Announces Limited Expansion of its Determination Letter Program for Individually Designed Retirement Plans – But Questions Remain
By Damian A. Myers and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in Uncategorized
Treasury and IRS Issue Eagerly-Awaited Guidance on Hardship Distributions – with a Few Surprises
By Paul M. Hamburger, Steven Einhorn and Jennifer Rigterink on Posted in 401(k) Plans, 403(b) Plans
