Group health plan sponsors should take note of the February 16, 2026 deadline to update HIPAA Notices of Privacy Practices (“NPPs”) to reflect recent privacy updates for Part 2 records.

What is an NPP and why does it impact employers and other plan sponsors?

HIPAA requires that covered entities, such as group health plans, provide notices to covered individuals describing how the covered entity uses and discloses protected health information (“PHI”).  While insurance companies typically manage the NPP requirement for those sponsoring fully insured plans, that is often not the case for self-insured plans.  Thus, employers and multiemployer boards sponsoring self-insured group health plans should be aware of the upcoming deadline. 

What changes are needed to the NPP by February 16?

In 2024, the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”) issued regulations (the “Final Rule”) that required covered entities to revise their NPPs to address privacy protections for Part 2 records.  By way of background, Part 2 records refer to substance abuse disorder treatment records, which are generally subject to more stringent protections than other health information covered by the HIPAA privacy rules.  At times, these differences have resulted in care coordination and information sharing difficulties; the Part 2 regulations issued over the past few years were intended to mitigate these issues in part. 

At a high level, health plans must update their NPPs by February 16 to address the following points that impact use and disclosure of Part 2 records:

  • Describe any use or disclosure that is prohibited or materially limited by Part 2.
  • Describe the limitations on use and disclosure of Part 2 records in legal proceedings without the individual’s written consent or a court order.
  • Provide a clear and conspicuous opportunity to opt out of fundraising communications before the covered entity uses Part 2 records for fundraising purposes. (Note: This seems unlikely to apply to a group health plan.)

The notice must be written in plain language and describe permitted uses and disclosures of Part 2 records, including a description of the individuals’ rights and the covered entity’s obligations.

Do we also need to mail the NPP to all covered participants by February 16?

No.  But, health plans must post the revised NPP on the health plan’s website by that date and include the revised NPP or an explanation of how to locate the updated NPP with the plan’s next annual mailing.  If the health plan does not regularly distribute documents via mail, depending on the situation and facts at hand, it may be possible to distribute the revised NPP to participants electronically.

Can we rely on the model NPP issued by HHS?

In the past, HHS issued model NPPs that could be used by group health plans as a starting point for drafting their own notices.  However, HHS has not yet issued an updated NPP reflecting the Part 2 updates.  Given the compliance deadline of February 16, 2026, it is unlikely that HHS will release a model NPP that can be used by group health plan sponsors to meet their obligations by the compliance deadline.

Do we have to make changes to the NPP related to reproductive healthcare?

No.  By way of background, the Final Rule requiring that health plans update their NPPs to reflect Part 2 restrictions also narrowed the permitted uses and disclosures of PHI in the context of an individual seeking, obtaining, providing, or facilitating lawful reproductive health care. (For more details, visit our previous blog posts here and here.) 

This past June, however, a federal district court in Texas vacated the portions of the Final Rule that added heightened protections for reproductive health care information, as discussed in our blog post here—a decision that HHS ultimately did not appeal.  This means that if a group health plan previously updated its NPP to refer to the reproductive healthcare provisions, it should revert the NPP to reflect the current status quo.

Separate from the NPP requirement, health plans that amended their HIPAA policies and procedures to comply with the reproductive health care provisions of the Final Rule should consider removing or revising language related to the reproductive healthcare rules, given those provisions are now vacated.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Alyssa Swanstrom

Alyssa Swanstrom is an associate in the Tax Department and is a member of the Compensation & Benefits Group.

Photo of Jennifer Rigterink Jennifer Rigterink

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified…

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified arrangements, health and welfare benefits, and fringe benefit programs.  She counsels single-employer and multiemployer clients on matters pertaining to plan administration, design and qualification, as well as regulatory, legislative and legal compliance.

In recent years, Jennifer has advised employers and plan sponsors with fiduciary and governance matters applicable to defined benefit plans and pension de-risking activities, including lump sum window programs, annuity purchases, and pension plan terminations.

Jennifer frequently counsels clients on health and welfare arrangements, with a particular focus on all matters relating to family building and reproductive health care benefits.  Her experience also includes working with employers and plan sponsors on mental health parity compliance issues.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Jennifer clerked for Judge Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and Judge Yvette Kane in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Photo of Amanda Karpovich Amanda Karpovich

Amanda M. Karpovich is a practice attorney in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group. She assists for-profit and not-for-profit entities with their employee benefit programs by counseling clients regarding design, qualification, administration, and compliance issues…

Amanda M. Karpovich is a practice attorney in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group. She assists for-profit and not-for-profit entities with their employee benefit programs by counseling clients regarding design, qualification, administration, and compliance issues associated with qualified retirement plans, health and welfare benefits, and fringe benefit programs. Amanda’s experience includes counseling clients regarding fiduciary and governance issues and structures, benefit aspects of corporate transactions, and claims and appeals processes. She also assists clients with preparing plan documents, summary plan descriptions, and other benefit communications.

Amanda frequently counsels clients on health and welfare arrangements, including cafeteria plans, health savings accounts, health reimbursement arrangements, flexible spending arrangements, and wellness programs.  Her experience includes advising clients regarding compliance with ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code, HIPAA, COBRA, MHPAEA, ACA, GINA, Medicare, and state individual mandate laws. Amanda’s health and welfare practice also includes negotiating with plan service providers and managing the qualified medical child support order process on behalf of clients. Amanda has also authored articles regarding health and welfare topics, including those published in the Buffalo Law Journal and Law360.

In addition, she has experience counseling public and private, U.S. and international, companies regarding compliance with the federal and state securities laws implicated when granting shares and other awards under equity compensation plans. She has assisted clients in drafting the securities filings required to register or to exempt such shares and awards with the SEC and the U.S. states and advised public companies regarding SEC disclosure of director and executive compensation and employee benefit arrangements in their annual proxy statements. With a diverse background as a securities and an employee benefits and executive compensation attorney, she is able to counsel clients regarding the interplay between the two types of law.

Amanda is a Board member of Big Brothers Big Sisters of Erie, Niagara and the Southern Tier, is the chair of their Young Professionals Board, and a member of their Governance Committee. She is also a member of the Buffalo Niagara Human Resource Association.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Amanda practiced as an associate in the Employee Benefits and Executive Compensation practice group and in the Securities and Capital Markets practice group at a firm located in Buffalo, New York. While in law school, Amanda served as a Judicial Extern in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York, clerking for Judge Leslie Foschio. She was also selected to receive The New York Bar Foundation’s Trusts and Estates Law Section Fellowship and clerked for Judge Barbara Howe in Erie County Surrogate’s Court.

Photo of Robert Projansky Robert Projansky

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Compensations and Benefits Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal compliance and…

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Compensations and Benefits Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal compliance and tax-qualification of ERISA-covered pension and welfare plans. Rob’s clients include the largest and highest-profile U.S. media and entertainment industry clients, as well as a broad range of Fortune 500 companies.

In the multiemployer context, he serves as counsel to the boards of trustees of a number of large and small funds and frequently assists clients in addressing issues related to the funding of defined benefit pension plans, including zone status, benefit suspensions, special financial assistance and withdrawal liability. He also advises these clients on healthcare compliance, cybersecurity and government investigations. In addition, his practice includes advising corporate clients on their responsibilities related to multiemployer plans, with particular expertise on the impact of multiemployer and collectively bargained plans in corporate transactions.

Rob has extensive experience advising corporate clients regarding general compliance issues and fiduciary compliance matters, including plan asset and prohibited transaction issues. He also has addressed a myriad of issues related to complex plan investments, including negotiation of separately managed and collective investment vehicles for both traditional and alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds and fund-of-funds vehicles.

Rob is described in Chambers USA as “incredibly smart and creative, and a really effective, zealous advocate” who “adroitly communicates complicated ERISA matters to clients in understandable language and well-timed levity.”  He is a widely sought after speaker on topics related to employee benefits, fiduciary, cybersecurity and government investigations and speaks each year at the annual conference and various other conferences sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, the largest educational organization in the employee benefits industry. Rob currently serves as one of the nine Advisory Directors on the Board of Directors of the International Foundation.