On September 30, 2025, Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued a final judgment on damages in Spence v. American Airlines, Inc., No. 4:23-cv-552 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 30, 2025), which related to challenges that American Airlines and its employee benefits committee (“AA”) violated their ERISA fiduciary duties by allowing their corporate environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) interests, as well as the Plan’s investment manager’s (the “IM”) ESG interests, to influence management of certain AA retirement plans (the “Plan”). In January this year, Judge O’Connor ruled that AA failed to act solely in the Plan’s best financial interests and therefore breached their duty of loyalty, but since AA acted in accordance with prevailing industry practices, AA did not also breach their duty of prudence (that ruling is discussed in more detail here). Following the January ruling, the Court was left to determine the appropriate remedy for the breach.
Judge O’Connor concluded that AA did not owe monetary damages for the breach of the duty of loyalty because the plaintiff failed to sufficiently establish actual financial losses to the Plan as a result of the breach. Rather, the court granted significant equitable relief, including permanently enjoining AA as follows:
Although this case is somewhat unique in finding a breach of duty of loyalty but not prudence, it serves as a reminder to Plan fiduciaries that, even where no monetary damages are awarded, a court can still award significant equitable relief to remedy a breach of ERISA fiduciary duty.