On Friday, the IRS released Notice 2023-62, which addresses certain pressing implementation issues related to the SECURE 2.0 requirement that catch-up contributions for participants with FICA wages of more than $145,000 during the prior calendar year from the employer maintaining the plan must be made on a Roth basis.

In welcome news for plan sponsors, the guidance announces a two-year “administrative transition period” for implementation of this requirement, which was otherwise set to take effect on January 1, 2024.  The notice confirms that, despite a drafting quirk in the SECURE 2.0 statute which suggested that catch-up contributions would be discontinued after 2023, catch-up contributions will continue to be available.  The notice also outlines future guidance that Treasury and the IRS intend to issue on other Roth catch-up requirement topics.

Two-Year Administrative Transition Period

By way of brief background, a “catch-up contribution” is an elective contribution made by a participant age 50 or older that exceeds otherwise applicable plan limits.  Under SECURE 2.0, starting January 1, 2024, all catch-up contributions made by participants with more than $145,000 in FICA wages from the employer maintaining the plan in the prior calendar year are required to be made on a Roth basis (i.e., after-tax).  Many plan sponsors and record keepers have struggled with implementing this new rule under time pressure.  In response, Notice 2023-62 offers a two-year administrative transition period for implementation of this requirement, during which:

  • Catch-up contributions made by participants to whom the Roth catch-up requirement applies will be treated as satisfying the requirement even if the catch-up contributions are not designated as Roth contributions—in essence, delaying the effective date of the Roth catch-up requirement until January 1, 2026.
  • Plans that do not currently permit Roth contributions may continue to allow catch-up contributions during the transition period.

Preview of Treasury and IRS Guidance Under Consideration

Notice 2023-62 also outlines guidance that the IRS intends to issue (subject to comment) regarding implementation of the Roth catch-up requirement, as described below:

  • Roth catch-up requirement does not apply to participants with non-FICA wages: Guidance clarifying that the Roth catch-up contribution requirement will not apply to participants who did not have FICA wages during the preceding calendar year from the employer sponsoring the plan—for example, in the case of a participant who was a partner or other self-employed individual.
  • “Deemed” Roth elections permissible for catch-up contributions: Guidance confirming that, in the case of a participant to whom the Roth catch-up requirement applies, a plan administrator and employer would be permitted to treat a participant’s election to make catch-up contributions on a pre-tax basis as a “deemed” election to make catch-up contributions on a Roth basis.
  • Plans maintained by more than one employer not required to aggregate wages from multiple participating employers when applying the Roth catch-up contribution requirement: Guidance clarifying that, for purposes of applying the Roth catch-up requirement to participants in a plan maintained by more than one employer (including a multiemployer plan), FICA wages would be reviewed on an employer-by-employer basis. For example, if a participant earned $100,000 from one participating employer and $125,000 from another participating employer, the Roth catch-up contribution requirement would not apply to that participant, even though the aggregate of wages earned from all participating employers under the plan exceeded $145,000. The guidance would also clarify that the Roth catch-up requirement would apply only to catch-up contributions made on deferrals of compensation from the participating employer from whom the participant earned more than $145,000—meaning that the participant could make catch-up contributions on a pre-tax basis on compensation of $145,000 or less from any other participating employer.

Next steps for plan sponsors and employers: Although Notice 2023-62 offers some much needed breathing room for plan sponsors and employers, given the complexity of system administration, efforts should continue toward a January 1, 2026 implementation date.  Written comments on the notice must be submitted by October 24, 2023—with a specific request for comments on whether a plan that does not offer Roth contributions would be permitted to discontinue catch-up contributions for highly compensated employees (but not for other groups) to comply with the SECURE 2.0 rules.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Jennifer Rigterink Jennifer Rigterink

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified…

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified arrangements, health and welfare benefits, and fringe benefit programs.  She counsels single-employer and multiemployer clients on matters pertaining to plan administration, design and qualification, as well as regulatory, legislative and legal compliance.

In recent years, Jennifer has advised employers and plan sponsors with fiduciary and governance matters applicable to defined benefit plans and pension de-risking activities, including lump sum window programs, annuity purchases, and pension plan terminations.

Jennifer frequently counsels clients on health and welfare arrangements, with a particular focus on all matters relating to family building and reproductive health care benefits.  Her experience also includes working with employers and plan sponsors on mental health parity compliance issues.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Jennifer clerked for Judge Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and Judge Yvette Kane in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.

Photo of Jay Jensen Jay Jensen

Jay Jensen is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Jay served as a staff attorney in the Tulane University Office of the General Counsel, advising the university on…

Jay Jensen is an associate in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Jay served as a staff attorney in the Tulane University Office of the General Counsel, advising the university on a broad range of legal issues, including labor and employment, non-profit law and taxation, regulatory compliance, data privacy, and general business transactions.

Jay earned his J.D. from Tulane Law School, where he trained as a student attorney in the Civil Rights and Federal Practice Clinic and received best speaker and brief awards competing in appellate moot court.

Before attending law school, Jay completed a graduate degree in Humanities and taught interdisciplinary college courses.