Looking forward to the weekend?  Many employers and plan administrators may also have been . . . up until yesterday, when the government issued new requirements that take effect on Saturday.  Specifically, starting this Saturday, January 15, 2022—yes, that’s four short days from now—and through the end of the public health emergency, group health plans and issuers are required to cover over-the-counter (OTC) at-home COVID-19 tests without participant cost-sharing, preauthorization, or medical management, even if no health care provider was involved in ordering the test.

How Did We Get Here?

By way of background, almost two years ago, pursuant to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), group health plans and issuers were required to cover “FDA-approved” COVID-19 testing without participant cost-sharing, preauthorization, or medical management.  Until relatively recently, FDA-approved COVID-19 testing required the involvement of a health care provider.  Once FDA-approved at-home COVID-19 tests that could be self-administered and self-read became widely available, it was unclear whether these tests were subject to the same coverage requirements that applied to COVID-19 testing involving a health care provider.

In response to a directive issued by the White House on December 2, 2021 to “clarify” the treatment of such at-home COVID-19 tests, the Departments of Labor, Treasury, and HHS released a set of “FAQs” on January 10, 2022, confirming that group health plans and issuers must provide coverage of OTC at-home COVID-19 tests without participant cost-sharing, preauthorization, or medical management.  This marks a significant expansion of the prior guidance on COVID-19 testing,[1] which mandated coverage of at-home COVID-19 tests only when required as a result of an individualized assessment or a test order from a health care provider.

What is the Scope of the Coverage Mandate for OTC At-Home COVID-19 Tests?

Group health plans and issuers will now be required to cover FDA-approved OTC at-home COVID-19 tests, regardless of whether a health care provider ordered the test or examined the individual to determine the need for a test (unless the FDA approval for the test requires the provider to have done so).  This coverage must be provided without participant cost sharing, preauthorization or medical management.

In the FAQs, the Departments affirmed that the new requirements do not impact prior guidance mandating coverage of COVID-19 testing ordered by an attending health care provider.  The Departments also confirmed that the new requirements do not alter prior guidance stating that employment-based COVID-19 testing (i.e., surveillance testing) is not required to be covered by group health plans and issuers.

How Is the Payment Made by the Plan or Issuer?

Group health plans and issuers can choose whether to pay sellers of COVID-19 tests directly (what the agencies call “direct coverage”) or require the covered individual to pay for it at the point of sale and then submit a reimbursement request to the plan or issuer.  The guidance strongly encourages direct coverage of OTC at-home COVID-19 testing.

Does the Guidance Require Unlimited Coverage of OTC At-Home COVID-19 Tests?

In a word, almost.  Coverage may not be limited to preferred pharmacies or retailers and must be provided without participant cost-sharing or medical management.

However, the guidance outlines a limited non-enforcement policy whereby plans and issuers may, under certain circumstances limit (1) the amount paid for at-home COVID-19 tests obtained from non-network pharmacies and retailers, but only if certain safe harbor requirements are met, and (2) the number of tests eligible for reimbursement in a 30-day period. These exceptions are described in more detail below.

In addition, although applying medical management techniques to at-home COVID-19 tests is prohibited, plans and issuers may take steps to prevent, detect, and address fraud and abuse.  Examples of permissible actions include requiring participant attestations that tests were purchased for personal use and not for employment-based or resale purposes, and, requiring documentation of a proof of purchase for tests showing the purchase price and date.

Proskauer observation: While the guidance is explicit that these steps cannot be overly burdensome, even an attestation can be somewhat useful (albeit hardly perfect) in mitigating the risk of fraud and abuse.

Can Plans and Issuers Limit the Amount They Reimburse Non-Network/Non-Preferred Pharmacies and Retailers for OTC At-Home COVID-19 Tests?

Generally, no, but the guidance includes a limited non-enforcement policy whereby a plan or issuer that meets certain requirements may limit the amount of reimbursement for tests from non-network pharmacies or retailers to the lesser of (1) the actual price of the test, or (2) $12.

This safe harbor may be used only if the plan or issuer makes direct coverage of at-home tests available through its pharmacy network and a direct-to-consumer shipping program at no cost to participants. Moreover, to use this safe harbor, access to an adequate number of tests must be available through direct coverage, based on a facts and circumstances analysis.  If there are not adequate tests through direct coverage, the plan or issuer would need to meet the normal requirements and could not set limits on the reimbursement amount for tests obtained from non-network pharmacies or retailers.

Proskauer observation: This safe harbor is an important limitation that helps address the risk of unscrupulous retailers significantly raising prices in order to take advantage of payors.  However, the scope and utility of this safe harbor is somewhat unclear in times like the present where there is a shortage of OTC tests. In any case, plans sponsors will want to contact their pharmacy benefit managers or other networks in short order to determine whether they have a direct coverage solution that will satisfy the safe harbor requirements and allow the plan to impose a dollar limitation on out-of-network costs.

Can Plans and Issuers Set Limits on the Number of OTC At-Home COVID-19 Tests Eligible for Reimbursement?

Yes. The guidance provides a limited non-enforcement policy under which a plan or issuer may limit the frequency of at-home COVID-19 tests to 8 tests per 30-day period (or calendar month).  This limit is applied on a per-participant or per-beneficiary basis, and cannot be limited to a smaller number of tests over a shorter period (e.g., 4 tests in a 15-day period).

Proskauer observation: While the limitation should still be sufficiently generous to provide coverage where necessary, it is welcome in that it helps limit fraud and abuse, as well as the potential for hoarding, which limits test availability.

Can Plans and Issuers Educate Participants on OTC Testing?

Yes, as long as the educational and informational resources provided by the plan or issuer are consistent with the FDA’s authorization for the tests and make clear that OTC testing coverage is provided as required.  The information could include an explanation of the differences between OTC tests and those performed/ordered by a provider and/or processed in a lab, quality information for specific tests (e.g., shelf life, expected test performance, etc.), how to obtain tests directly from the plan or network providers and how to submit a claim for reimbursement.

Proskauer observation: Plans and issuers may wish to consider taking the Departments up on this suggestion, as it may make it more likely that OTC testing is used effectively and does not result in duplicative or excess costs.

[1]  See Part 43 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/faqs/aca-part-43.pdf) and Part 44 (https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/ebsa/about-ebsa/our-activities/resource-center/faqs/aca-part-44.pdf) of the Affordable Care Act Implementation Frequently Asked Questions, and, in particular, Q4 of Part 43.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Robert Projansky Robert Projansky

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal…

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal compliance and tax-qualification of ERISA-covered pension and welfare plans. Rob’s clients include the largest and highest-profile U.S. media and entertainment industry clients, as well as a broad range of Fortune 500 companies.

In the multiemployer context, he serves as counsel to the boards of trustees of a number of large and small funds and frequently assists clients in addressing issues related to the funding of defined benefit pension plans, including zone status, benefit suspensions, special financial assistance and withdrawal liability. He also advises these clients on healthcare compliance, cybersecurity and government investigations. In addition, his practice includes advising corporate clients on their responsibilities related to multiemployer plans, with particular expertise on the impact of multiemployer and collectively bargained plans in corporate transactions.

Rob has extensive experience advising corporate clients regarding general compliance issues and fiduciary compliance matters, including plan asset and prohibited transaction issues. He also has addressed a myriad of issues related to complex plan investments, including negotiation of separately managed and collective investment vehicles for both traditional and alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds and fund-of-funds vehicles.

Rob is described in Chambers USA as “incredibly smart and creative, and a really effective, zealous advocate” who “adroitly communicates complicated ERISA matters to clients in understandable language and well-timed levity.”  He is a widely sought after speaker on topics related to employee benefits, fiduciary, cybersecurity and government investigations and speaks each year at the annual conference and various other conferences sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, the largest educational organization in the employee benefits industry. Rob currently serves as one of the nine Advisory Directors on the Board of Directors of the International Foundation.

Photo of Jennifer Rigterink Jennifer Rigterink

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified…

Jennifer Rigterink is senior counsel in the Labor Department and a member of the Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation Group.

Jennifer focuses on a diverse array of tax and ERISA issues impacting employee benefits.  Her wide-ranging practice encompasses qualified retirement plans and non-qualified arrangements, health and welfare benefits, and fringe benefit programs.  She counsels single-employer and multiemployer clients on matters pertaining to plan administration, design and qualification, as well as regulatory, legislative and legal compliance.

In recent years, Jennifer has advised employers and plan sponsors with fiduciary and governance matters applicable to defined benefit plans and pension de-risking activities, including lump sum window programs, annuity purchases, and pension plan terminations.

Jennifer frequently counsels clients on health and welfare arrangements, with a particular focus on all matters relating to family building and reproductive health care benefits.  Her experience also includes working with employers and plan sponsors on mental health parity compliance issues.

Prior to joining Proskauer, Jennifer clerked for Judge Jacques L. Wiener, Jr., in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit and Judge Yvette Kane in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.