On August 7, 2025, President Trump signed an executive order entitled “Democratizing Access to Alternative Assets for 401(k) Investors” (the “Executive Order”), which directs the Department of Labor (the “DOL”) and the Securities Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to relieve regulatory burdens and litigation risk that impede investments in alternative assets (including crypto, private equity, private credit and real estate) by 401(k) and other defined contribution plan (collectively, “DC Plans”) participants.  The Executive Order states that more than 90 million Americans participate in employer-sponsored DC Plans, but most of those are currently restricted from investing in alternative assets, unlike “wealthy investors” and participants in public retirement plans. 

The $12.5 trillion of assets held in DC Plans has long been a target for alternative asset managers.  Likewise, many DC Plan participants and sponsors have advocated for better access to such investments to enhance growth and diversification opportunities.  On the other hand, detractors cite higher costs, increased complexity and lack of transparency and liquidity as reasons to restrict access to alternative assets.  Although such investments are not (and have never been) per se prohibited for DC Plans under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), concerns about litigation risk (class actions alleging that it was imprudent to offer alternative investments) for plan fiduciaries, as well as securities law and other regulatory hurdles, have effectively kept such investments from becoming mainstream in DC Plan investment option lineups.

Background

On June 3, 2020, during the first Trump administration, the DOL published an Information Letter confirming that investment options under a DC Plan may include a limited allocation to private equity (the “2020 Letter”, discussed here).  Notably, the 2020 Letter did not discuss direct investment in private equity funds (for example, by adding a private equity fund to the plan’s investment lineup).  Rather, the 2020 Letter discussed including private equity as a small allocation (no more than 15%) within a diversified investment option such as a balanced fund or a target date fund. 

Although the 2020 Letter led to some optimism for proponents of alternative assets in DC Plans, a subsequent Supplemental Statement (issued on December 21, 2021, during the Biden administration and discussed here) urged more caution.  The Supplemental Statement emphasized that the DOL “did not endorse or recommend” offering designated investment alternatives with private equity components in the 2020 Letter, and that it wanted “to ensure that plan fiduciaries do not expose plan participants and beneficiaries to unwarranted risks by misreading” the 2020 Letter as saying that these investments are “generally appropriate for a typical 401(k) plan.”

Importantly, the 2020 Letter did not provide any kind of safe harbor for including alternative assets in 401(k) plan investment options, and the Supplement Statement did not prohibit such investments.  The guidance simply provided that limited private equity allocations within a DC Plan investment option are permitted, but that rigorous analysis is critical when evaluating the prudence of such investments given their complexity.

The Executive Order

The Executive Order directs the DOL, within 180 days, to reexamine its guidance regarding an ERISA fiduciary’s duties in connection with making available to DC Plan participants an asset allocation fund that includes investments in alternative assets (including consideration of recission of the Supplemental Statement).  For this purpose, “alternative assets” include not only private equity, private credit, real estate, and other asset classes that are not publicly traded, but also commodities and digital assets.[1]

The Executive Order also directs the DOL within such 180-day period, as it deems appropriate and consistent with applicable law, to seek to clarify its position and propose guidance on alternative assets and the appropriate fiduciary process associated with offering asset allocation funds containing investments in alternative assets.  The Executive Order says the guidance may include appropriately calibrated safe harbors and directs the DOL to prioritize actions that may curb ERISA litigation that constrains fiduciaries’ ability to apply their best judgment in allowing alternative investments for DC Plan participants.

The DOL is further directed to consult with the Secretary of the Treasury, the SEC, and other Federal regulators as necessary.  Similarly, the SEC is directed to consider ways to facilitate access to alternative investments, including potential revisions to existing rules relating to accredited investor and qualified purchaser status, which are currently hurdles to direct investments in alternative assets by most DC Plan participants.

Key Takeaways

  • While the 2020 Letter focused only on permitting investments in diversified investment options that included a small allocation to private equity, the Executive Order picks up a much broader range of assets, including cryptocurrency and other digital assets (furthering the DOL’s recent rescission of its 2022 guidance that cautioned against investment in cryptocurrencies, discussed here) and does not suggest a cap on a fund’s allocation to alternative assets. 
  • The Executive Order does not by itself change any existing rules or guidance.  Rather it is a directive for agencies to revisit their guidance and to issue new guidance as they determine to be appropriate to achieve the policies described in the Executive Order.  It remains to be seen whether the DOL, SEC or other Federal regulators will issue new guidance and what such guidance will say.   While the Executive Order strikes an encouraging tone, its ultimate impact is yet to be seen.  However, those wishing to allow these offerings have reason for optimism that they could become more common if, for example, the Federal regulators institute some type of safe harbor – a possibility suggested by the Executive Order.
  • We are monitoring developments and will update as warranted.

[1] For purposes of the Executive Order, the term “alternative assets” means: (i) private market investments, including direct and indirect interests in equity, debt, or other financial instruments that are not traded on public exchanges, including those where the managers of such investments, if applicable, seek to take an active role in the management of such companies; (ii) direct and indirect interests in real estate, including debt instruments secured by direct or indirect interests in real estate; (iii) holdings in actively managed investment vehicles that are investing in digital assets; (iv) direct and indirect investments in commodities; (v) direct and indirect interests in projects financing infrastructure development; and (vi) lifetime income investment strategies including longevity risk-sharing pools.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Adam Scoll Adam Scoll

Adam Scoll is a partner in the Firm’s Tax Department and Private Funds Group.

He specializes in the area of Title I of ERISA and the investment of ERISA “plan assets,” advising both pension trusts and their investment managers and advisers with regard…

Adam Scoll is a partner in the Firm’s Tax Department and Private Funds Group.

He specializes in the area of Title I of ERISA and the investment of ERISA “plan assets,” advising both pension trusts and their investment managers and advisers with regard to compliance with ERISA’s complex fiduciary duty and prohibited transaction rules.

Adam regularly advises private investment fund sponsors regarding the structuring of their funds in order to accept investments from ERISA-covered pension trusts, including compliance with the ERISA “plan asset” regulations and the operation of venture capital operating companies (VCOCs) and real estate operating companies (REOCs).

Photo of Ira G. Bogner Ira G. Bogner

Ira G. Bogner is Managing Partner of the Firm. He is the immediate former chair of the Firm’s Tax Department. He is a member of the Compensations and Benefits Group and the Firm’s Executive Committee. Ira represents a varied list of clients, including…

Ira G. Bogner is Managing Partner of the Firm. He is the immediate former chair of the Firm’s Tax Department. He is a member of the Compensations and Benefits Group and the Firm’s Executive Committee. Ira represents a varied list of clients, including financial service companies, entertainment industry clients, and tax-exempt organizations, and also actively represents individual executives in executive compensation matters.

Ira counsels clients with respect to the tax, securities law disclosure, corporate governance, stock exchange and other requirements relevant to executive compensation arrangements. Ira also provides advice regarding equity arrangements, employment agreements, change in control agreements and all other types of executive compensation arrangements, including guidance regarding “409A,” “162m,” “457A,” and “280G.”

Ira frequently is called on to structure and analyze alternative investments for pension trusts and other exempt organizations. He also works with the Firm’s corporate and real estate lawyers in structuring and maintaining investment funds that include participation by pension plans. Through his work in the investment fund area Ira has obtained substantial experience in applying the rules provided under the “plan asset” regulations, including the operation of venture capital operating companies and real estate operating companies. He has assisted in the formation of private equity, real estate, infrastructure and hedge funds, including “fund of funds.” Ira also has advised clients on both avoiding ERISA “plan asset” status and operating an investment fund in accordance with ERISA.

Areas of Concentration

Ira has provided guidance to clients on a wide variety of matters in the areas of employee benefits and executive compensation, including:

  • investment of plan assets
  • implementation of employee benefit plans

  • employee benefit issues in mergers and acquisitions

  • awarding of equity-based compensation

  • negotiation and drafting of employment agreements and severance arrangements

  • structuring, analyzing and maintaining investment funds that are suitable for plan investors

Thought Leadership

Ira has published a number of articles in publications such as The New York Law Journal, The New Jersey Law Journal, The Daily Deal, The Journal of Pension Planning and Compliance, Mergers and Acquisitions (The Monthly Tax Journal), The Journal of Taxation and Regulation of Financial Institutions, The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel, European Private Equity & Venture Capital Associations, The LPA Anatomised and Private Equity International and has been named to the Board of Advisors of the Journal of Taxation and Regulation of Financial Institutions. He also has lectured on topics such as the classification of workers, drafting employment agreements, equity alternatives for senior executives, investing IRA assets, the plan asset regulations, shareholder approval of equity plans, Code Section 409A, and key provisions for ERISA investors investing in a private equity fund.

Recognition

Ira has been recognized and ranked by various directories. US Legal 500 has carried the following comments: “Ira Bogner is ‘available, responsive and knowledgeable;” “Ira Bogner ‘provides a level of comfort with respect to business issues that is rare in the world of ERISA;” “Ira Bogner is the ‘go-to guy for fund sponsors needing help with ERISA.’”

Photo of Robert Projansky Robert Projansky

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Compensations and Benefits Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal compliance and…

Robert M. Projansky is a partner in the Compensations and Benefits Group and is currently a member of the Firm’s Executive Committee.

Rob has a broad practice advising both multiemployer and single employer clients on all issues related to the legal compliance and tax-qualification of ERISA-covered pension and welfare plans. Rob’s clients include the largest and highest-profile U.S. media and entertainment industry clients, as well as a broad range of Fortune 500 companies.

In the multiemployer context, he serves as counsel to the boards of trustees of a number of large and small funds and frequently assists clients in addressing issues related to the funding of defined benefit pension plans, including zone status, benefit suspensions, special financial assistance and withdrawal liability. He also advises these clients on healthcare compliance, cybersecurity and government investigations. In addition, his practice includes advising corporate clients on their responsibilities related to multiemployer plans, with particular expertise on the impact of multiemployer and collectively bargained plans in corporate transactions.

Rob has extensive experience advising corporate clients regarding general compliance issues and fiduciary compliance matters, including plan asset and prohibited transaction issues. He also has addressed a myriad of issues related to complex plan investments, including negotiation of separately managed and collective investment vehicles for both traditional and alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds and fund-of-funds vehicles.

Rob is described in Chambers USA as “incredibly smart and creative, and a really effective, zealous advocate” who “adroitly communicates complicated ERISA matters to clients in understandable language and well-timed levity.”  He is a widely sought after speaker on topics related to employee benefits, fiduciary, cybersecurity and government investigations and speaks each year at the annual conference and various other conferences sponsored by the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans, the largest educational organization in the employee benefits industry. Rob currently serves as one of the nine Advisory Directors on the Board of Directors of the International Foundation.

Photo of Seth Safra Seth Safra

Seth J. Safra leads Proskauer’s Compensation & Benefits Group. Described by clients as “extremely knowledgeable, practical, and strategic,” Seth advises clients on compensation and benefit programs.

Seth’s experience covers a broad range of retirement plan designs, from traditional defined benefit to cash balance…

Seth J. Safra leads Proskauer’s Compensation & Benefits Group. Described by clients as “extremely knowledgeable, practical, and strategic,” Seth advises clients on compensation and benefit programs.

Seth’s experience covers a broad range of retirement plan designs, from traditional defined benefit to cash balance and floor-offset arrangements, ESOPs and 401(k) plans—often coordinating qualified and non-qualified arrangements. He also advises tax-exempt and governmental employers on 403(b) and 457 arrangements, as well as innovative new plan designs; and he advises on ERISA compliance for investments.

On the health and welfare side, Seth helps employers provide benefits that are cost-effective and competitive. He advises on plan design, including consumer-driven health plans with HSAs, retiree medical, fringe benefits, and severance programs, ERISA preemption, and tax and other compliance issues, such as nondiscrimination and cafeteria plan rules.

Seth also advises for-profit and non-profit employers, compensation committees, and boards on executive employment, deferred compensation, change in control, and equity and other incentive arrangements. In addition, he advises on compensation and benefits in corporate transactions.

Seth represents clients before the Department of Labor, IRS and other government agencies.

Seth has been recognized by Chambers USA, The Legal 500, Best Lawyers, Law360, Human Resource Executive, Lawdragon and Super Lawyers.